This presentation was given by Dr. Donna Jacobs, HCI Country Director for South Africa, at the 28th International Conference of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, Ltd. (ISQua), which took place in Hong Kong, China from September 14-17, 2011. The conference theme was, “Patient Safety: Sustaining the Global Momentum."
This presentation was given by Dr. Donna Jacobs, HCI Country Director for South Africa, at the 28th International Conference of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, Ltd. (ISQua), which took place in Hong Kong, China from September 14-17, 2011. The conference theme was, “Patient Safety: Sustaining the Global Momentum."
The Uganda Ministry of Health (MoH) Quality Improvement Strategy Meeting was convened in Kampala, Uganda, on March 21–22, 2011. The meeting provided a forum for various departments within the MoH, selected partners, and international improvement experts to share experiences, clarify the role of Government partners, and discuss lessons learned from implementing health care quality improvement initiatives at national and local levels. The MoH Quality Assurance Department (QAD) together with the United States Agency for International Development Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) organized and supported this meeting.
Dr. Henry Mwebesa, Commissioner of QAD, chaired the meeting. Dr. M. Rashad Massoud, Director of HCI and Senior Vice President of the Quality & Performance Institute, University Research Co., LLC, designed and facilitated for the meeting.
Throughout the two days, participants shared their experiences with quality improvement (QI) efforts across multiple levels of the health sector, identified challenges and interventions while implementing QI, and made recommendations for harmonizing and sustaining QI efforts in Uganda. Examples discussed were from Uganda, Afghanistan, Sweden, Niger, South Africa, Ethiopia, Russia, and Palestine.
This report summarizes the key discussions during the meeting.
The purpose of this paper is to review and analyze international experiences on health care accreditation, especially in middle-income countries, as they relate to the present South Africa accreditation environment. The paper is the first phase of a two-phase project to provide advice and recommendations on how to proceed with the proposed accreditation programme. This paper reviews what is “known” and what is not known about health care accreditation programmes internationally. While a few European regional studies have been completed, only one international survey (2001) of health care accreditation programmes has been done, although a new survey has recently just been commissioned but will not be available until 2011. Relatively little is known or published about health care accreditation in middle income countries, as relatively few programmes have been established or are successful. This paper documents what information is presently available on these country programmes.
This is the revised version of the Primary Health Care Supervision Manual developed by the National Department of Health and serves as key tool for strengthening the delivery and improving the quality of Primary Health Care services, the cornerstone of the national health care system. It follows on the earlier Clinic Supervisor’s Manual that was originally introduced to the public health sector at a national workshop in October 2000 and adopted in March 2004 for countrywide use. Since the introduction of the Manual in 2000, the health care system has undergone significant transformational changes as a result of changes in the burden of disease in South Africa. These changes have resulted in the development of new programmes that were not included in the former manual. Materials used in this revised version draw from a number of sources, all of which have been field-tested and have proven to be very useful tools in supervising primary health care programs.
The manual contains guidelines for quality supervision, use of supervision support checklists, conducing in-depth technical program reviews, and tools for working with Primary Health Care Facility Committees.
This short booklet describes some of the results and lessons learned from HIV/AIDS and TB care improvement efforts in five provinces of South Africa.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funded Quality Assurance Project (QAP) and its follow on, the USAID Health Care Improvement (HCI) Project under URC have, since 2001, been engaged in work that is crucial for health system strengthening with respect to HIV and AIDS programmes and TB. These diseases require ongoing intervention, monitoring and treatment, and when they present on a mass scale, as they do in South Africa, necessitate measures that are not easy to institute. Indeed, an entire infrastructure has to be put in place wherever affected people require treatment, and especially so in rural areas, where rates of infection are high but medical facilities are scarce.
USAID’s QAP and HCI Projects intervened to answer this need, creating small but effective infrastructures at crucial nodes to support South Africa’s health systems, and to bolster the health of the population in general with basic health care programmes. This publication is a compilation of success stories written over an eight-year period to document developments supported by QAP and the HCI Project.
Lessons Lessons learned from OVC programs have revealed the need to improve service quality and to strengthen harmonization across partners around the questions: How can our programs make a measurable difference in children’s well-being? What are the essential actions that we all agree need to be part of a service to best to mitigate the impact of HIV/AIDS on children and families, in the pursuit of efficiency, effectiveness, equity, reach, and scale and sustainability? In response to the observed need to improve the quality of services provided to orphans and vulnerable children, in 2007, PEPFAR, through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), sought to create a regional initiative to support countries and implementing partners in improving the quality of OVC programming. With support from the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI), a regional OVC quality improvement initiative was organized. The initiative, which has come to be known as Care that Counts, has engaged national stakeholders, program implementers, and donor agencies throughout sub-Saharan Africa in improving the quality of OVC programming.
This short report describes the efforts of the Care that Counts Initiative to support to implementers at the country level to:
1) Build constituencies and commitment for quality in OVC programming,
2) Develop OVC service standards through consensus processes involving key stakeholders, including children and their families,
3) Undertake quality improvement activities at the point of service delivery with community-based volunteers and organizations, and
4) Gather evidence that standards and other quality improvement approaches have a measurable impact.
This report presents reflections on South African supporters of DOTS, the internationally recommended strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control. The DOTS strategy has been implemented on a national level in South Africa's fight against TB, and DOTS supporters are lay health workers who provide some of the services called for by the strategy. The report draws on qualitative data from the Western Cape metropolitan area and the Nyandeni district of the Eastern Cape. While the DOTS strategy has been widely implemented, still little understood are factors such as: the extent to which TB patients value it, the experiences of supporters in providing support, the necessary conditions for ensuring a successful support program, and the likelihood of successful integration of an HIV/AIDS program into a successful TB DOTS program. The research discussed in this report focused on exploring, from the providers' and consumers' perspectives, a range of organizational factors that are perceived to be necessary to facilitate the function of the DOTS supporters. The report concludes with recommendations to health providers and policy makers to improve the delivery of care to patients with TB. It asserts that before DOTS supporter programs are implemented in a community, the formal health facilities in the area need to be fully functional. It also concludes that for DOTS supporters to be effective, some sustainable form of incentives needs to be provided. (author's)
Still emerging from the vestiges of apartheid, South Africa's healthcare system is, generally, not conducive to quality. As it strives to improve the quality of the healthcare delivery system, the government must particularly focus on equal access, although resource limits deter progress. At the government's request, the Quality Assurance Project (QAP) reviewed South Africa's healthcare accreditation programs to measure their contribution to service quality. Largely limited to industrialized countries, accreditation is one type of quality initiative: It provides that a disinterested group external to healthcare facilities develops and publishes explicit standards describing how facilities should be organized, what resources are needed to provide care, and how care should be provided. After a period of standards implementation, trained observers visit each facility and measure compliance. Facilities that score high enough are accredited for a specified period. South Africa began to institute accreditation in the mid-1990s; the QAP review occurred in 2004 and consisted of in-depth interviews with stakeholders and document review. (excerpt)