Uganda | USAID Health Care Improvement Portal
Follow Us HCI Project on FacebookHCI Project on Vimeo
Why Register?     Register      Login

Uganda

  • Task Shifting in HIV/AIDS Service Delivery: An Exploratory Study of Expert Patients in Uganda | Publications

    As a developing country, Uganda has both limited resources and an increased demand for health services created by the chronic care required to maintain antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) among other issues. Over the past several years in Uganda, many health facilities have adopted strategies to shift some facility and community-based tasks to “expert patients,” clients who are recruited and trained to provide support services for other clients in facilities and in communities.

    Although several non-government organizations (NGOs) and public health systems have integrated expert patients into HIV/AIDS care and support using a variety of models, there is a lack of knowledge about how and how well they contribute to improving access to and the quality of health care. Among the significant gaps in the current literature, limited documentation and robust evidence exist about the range of tasks expert patients perform; how they are recruited, trained and supervised; and how communities are involved in the selection and use of expert patients.
     
    In an effort to understand these issues from the Ugandan context, the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) carried out a qualitative study in May 2011 at six health facilities that were using expert patients. This study explores three main research questions:
     
    i. How are expert patients being used?
    ii. What organizational support is provided to expert patients?
    iii. What are the perceptions of actors most closely affected by the use of expert patients?
  • Health facility factors associated with improvements in the quality of HIV/AIDS care at health facilities in Uganda | Publications

    Several factors are associated with HIV patient enrollment, retention in ART care and treatment outcomes. These factors can broadly be categorized into patient and health facility factors. To improve the quality of HIV care services at health units, there is need to account for the modifiable and fixed characteristics of the health units. This study investigated the relationship between characteristics of the facility and the changes in quality of care indicators in the context of an intervention to improve services delivered in the facilities.

    Methodology
    This was a quantitative pre/post intervention study to identify facility factors associated with improvements achieved at health facilities participating in quality improvement activities. Improvements in service delivery were measured by comparing performance on some indicators collected at the start of the intervention to the endline measures (six month later) on the same indicators. Data on health facility characteristics were collected using a standard questionnaire administered to health unit in-charges and heads of HIV clinics. Simple descriptive statistics were used to define characteristics of the health facilities while health facility factors associated with the quality of HIV/AIDS care were obtained through univariate linear and logistic regressions.
     
    Results
    A total of 45 health facilities were involved in improvement activities for at least six months and these were predominantly rural. Most facilities had separate HIV clinics but only a third had a dedicated HIV clinical team. At the outpatient department, the patient to staff ratio was 576:1 with an average 6.7 clinical staff members working on an HIV clinic day. There were no statistically significant associations between the region a facility was located in or the type of facility and any measure of performance in indicators. Health facilities located in rural areas perform slightly better than those in urban areas and clinics with more medical officers were worse at having patients adhere to clinic appointments (OR 0.38: P= 0.042). Other significant findings were that facilities with higher clinic staff members per clinic day did worse on indicator 1 (OR 0.79; P = 0.041) as did facilities with CD4 testing facilities (OR 0.32; P = 0.084).
     
    Conclusions and Recommendations

    The study found very few significant associations between characteristics of the participating facilities examined in this study and their performance in the improvement intervention. The variation in improvements seen in clinics may be due more to other characteristics of the facilities not measured, such as the types of patients they serve. Based on our findings, we recommend that facilities working to improve performance in service delivery focus on changing factors identified as causes of deficits in quality independent of considerations of the immutable characteristics of their facility. Any future study on this topic should take into account patient factors because patients with certain characteristics associated with HIV treatment indicators might be unevenly distributed among the facilities.

    A final version of this study will be avaible soon.

     

  • Uganda| Private Sector Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Adaptability of better care practices to improve HIV/AIDS care as they spread across sites in Uganda | Publications

    26 facilities in the Northern Region of Uganda are participating in the collaborative improvement effort implementing the ART Framework. This study aims to understand how best practices to improve HIV/AIDS care are modified and adapted as they are spread across and implemented at these various sites, which are free to choose which changes they wish to apply and to modify those changes to suit their needs. This study will identify best practices that are being spread throughout the facilities and gather details of the implementation of specific changes. Tentatively, the following three practices will be studied: 1) giving 2-3 months supply of ARVs to adherent patients to improve retention, 2) pre-packaging medicines to reduce waiting time and ultimately improve coverage and clinic efficiency, and 3) using a screening tool for detecting tuberculosis in HIV/AIDS patients to improve clinical outcomes. The study will look at best practices that are implemented by five or more of the 26 participating facilities in order to understand how that change is modified across different sites.

     

  • Spread of better care practices to improve coverage, retention and outcomes of patients receiving ART care in resource-limited settings | Uganda | Publications

    The collaborative model of quality improvement (QI) aims at testing and implementing QI interventions on a small scale, synthesizing the most robust and effective changes, and spreading them at scale. An improvement collaborative not only generates improvements in the quality of care delivered in these initial sites, but also develops organizational learning. However, there still exist knowledge gaps on how to successfully spread evidence practices and ensure up-take and continuous application of these practices in resource-limited settings.

    The objective of this descriptive, prospective study is to gain a better understanding of how better care practices identified from demonstration collaboratives can be spread to and embraced by new sites at scale. By studying spread, future improvement collaboratives will have a better understanding of factors affecting uptake and continuous application of better care practices identified in demonstration collaboratives, and how to introduce such practices to spread sites.
     
    This study will focus on four research questions:
     
    ·         What processes need to be implemented to introduce and ensure spread of better care practices to the new sites? And how can these be improved?
    ·         Which best practices spread to new sites?
    ·         What factors (including resources) facilitated or hindered the uptake of the better care practices?
    ·         Did these practices lead to better coverage, better retention and better outcomes for ART patients in the new sites?
     
    Data for this study will be collected from the 19 facilities in the Eastern region.

     

     

  • Patient involvement in quality improvement activities at HIV/AIDS clinics in Uganda | Publications

    Quality improvement is becoming an important component of health care world over and there is growing recognition in the literature of the contribution patients can make to improving health outcomes (Coulter 2007, Groene 2005). Given the increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses, there is a need to have patients play an active role in their health care. This study will examine the extent to which selected interventions successfully engaged clients and providers together in quality improvement activities (problem identification, problem analysis, solution identification, and testing and implementing changes) in HIV/AIDS care clinics (in comparison to control clinics) in Uganda, and what health care providers’ and clients perceptions are on clients’ active participation in the process.

    Since 2007 the USAID Health Care Improvement (HCI) project and the Ministry of Health-Uganda have been implementing collaborative quality improvement activities in Uganda to improve the quality of service offered to clients attending HIV care clinics. Findings from a preliminary assessment revealed that clients are minimally involved in quality improvement activities at the facility-level. To address this, HCI is supporting an intervention to promote client involvement.
     

    This pre/post qualitative evaluation will include six intervention and six control sites. HCI coaches will provide feedback to the intervention sites and present to them a selection of interventions to increase client involvement. Sites will be invited to select the interventions that best suit their facility’s needs and resources.

     

  • Improving enrolment of HIV+ pregnant women in chronic HIV care/ART units at health facilities in Uganda | Publications

    HCI is working on improving the linkage of HIV+ pregnant women to chronic HIV/PMTCT services in 19 health facilities in the Eastern region of Uganda. Quality improvement teams at these sites will test changes aiming to improve these linkages. The effectiveness of these changes will be monitored by selected indicators. Changes that are found to be successful based on monitoring the indicators will then be shared across all 19 facilities. It is expected that by the end of the demonstration period there will be a list of effective changes that can then be spread to more facilities across Uganda.

    Research Questions
    This cross-sectional pre/post evaluation seeks to evaluate the scale of linkage problems, identify their causes, and inform health facility interventions to improve the linkages between ANC and chronic care for HIV+ mothers. The specific study questions are:
     
    1.      What proportion of HIV+ pregnant women registered in ANC units at health facilities are enrolled into chronic HIV care units?
    2.      What mechanisms do the health facilities use to ensure successful linkage of HIV+ pregnant women to HIV care clinic?
    3.      What factors do pregnant or recently (6 months) delivered women report that promoted their successful enrollment into chronic care from ANC units?

     

  • Uganda| Maternal Newborn Child Health (MNCH) Community Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Uganda| Palliative Care Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Uganda| Maternal Newborn Child Health (MNCH) Facility Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Comparison of Coaching Strategies for Improvement Collaboratives in Ugandan HIV/AIDS Health Centres | Publications

     

    HCI has been implementing centrally organized collaborative improvement, with coaching provided by technical experts outside the MOH hierarchy, in 113 sites in Uganda to improve health care for patients with HIV/AIDS since 2006. In 2008, HCI introduced a district-based coaching strategy using MOH district management structures, as an alternative to centrally organized coaching, to facilitate sustainability of the approach and encourage its institutionalization and greater country ownership in the Ugandan health system.This study’s goal was to measure the relative efficiency and effectiveness of the two strategies in achieving improvements in process indicators.
     
    The study found that there were mostly very small improvements in quality indicators for both district and central strategy sites but these were generally not associated quality improvement team performance (QITP). There were some differences in QITP in four of 13 team indicators but no difference in improvements between district and central strategy sites. The district strategy was about 1/5th the cost of the Central strategy cost and therefore significantly more efficient. We therefore recommend the MOH use the district rather than the central strategy for more widespread interventions.
     
    HCI is preparing a manuscript for journal submission.

     

  • Situation Anaysis- Village Health Teams Uganda 2009 | Community Resource

    This situation analysis documented the status of Village Health Teams (VHTs) in Uganda in 2009, including their numbers, functionality, and activities. It was intended to serve as a surrogate baseline for districts, many of which have little or no documentation of VHT implementation. The authors carried out both a desk review and field visits relating to Village Health Teams and community health interventions in Uganda. They found that 62 districts have trained VHTs but coverage and quality varies.

  • Community Health Worker Programs: A Review of Recent Literature | Community Resource

    This paper reviews recently published literature on community health worker programs, primarily focusing on maternal and newborn child health. Eighteen CHW programs and eleven relevant articles were included. It identifies key components of successful CHWs programs, reviews past successes and failures of CHW program implementation and summarizes important lessons learned.

  • Meeting Requirements for Team Learning In Quality Improvement: An Assessment of QI Teams in Western Uganda | Publications

    This presentation was given by Herbert Kisamba, QI Advisor for HCI Uganda, at the 28th International Conference of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, Ltd. (ISQua), which took place in Hong Kong, China from September 14-17, 2011. The conference theme was, “Patient Safety: Sustaining the Global Momentum.”

  • Functionality of Quality Improvement Teams at Multi-level Health Facilities: Experiences from Southwest Uganda | Publications

    This poster was presented by John Byabagambi, QI Advisor for HCI Uganda, at the 28th International Conference of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, Ltd. (ISQua), which took place in Hong Kong, China from September 14-17, 2011. The conference theme was, “Patient Safety: Sustaining the Global Momentum.”

  • Building on the Successes of HIV and TB Programs to Improve Care for Non-Communicable Diseases in Uganda | Publications

    This short report describes the assistance that the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) is providing the Uganda Ministry of Health (MOH) to change the way care is provided to people living with chronic conditions. HCI is promoting the use of the Chronic Care Model, an evidence-based set of principles for improving chronic condition care that has been endorsed by the World Health Organization. HCI is working with clients, providers and managers in Buikwe District and the central MOH to train patients and providers from 14 clinics about the principles of good chronic care and help form quality improvement teams in each facility to change their systems to be more responsive to the needs of patients with chronic conditions.

  • The Validity of Self-assessment Data in a Ugandan Quality Improvement Program | Publications

    This report assesses data validity in 34 of the 113 HCI-supported health facilities in Uganda focused on improving quality of care in HIV services. This report evaluates data validity for several key project indicators and gives recommendations to help facilities and Uganda’s Ministry of Health (MoH) improve data collection and use. The data validation was designed as a descriptive cross sectional study using qualitative and quantitative methods to examine each facility’s performance in recording and analyzing four mandatory indicators. The field data collection team used a checklist to assess the quality of the facility’s data management system and a data verification tool to tally and record data verified from source documents through recounting. Because Quality Improvement teams rely on the data they collect to identify effective changes and make decisions on how to improve quality of care, the validity of data is vitally important to the collaborative’s efforts.

  • Strengthening Community Health Systems to Improve Health Care at the Community Level | Publications

    This short report summarizes the ways in which the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) is working with local groups and partners to apply quality improvement (QI) methods within the Community Health System in order to strengthen the impact of CHWs and other service providers at the community level, while at the same time increasing sustainability of programmatic impacts. Currently carrying out activities in more than 30 countries globally, HCI seeks to develop the capacity of health systems to apply modern QI approaches to make essential services better meet the needs of underserved populations; improve efficiency and outcomes; reduce costs from poor quality; and improve health worker capacity, engagement, and performance.

  • Final Report: Safety and Feasibility of Community-Based Distribution of Depo Provera in Nakasongola, Uganda | Community Resource

    The goal of this intervention was to improve access to contraceptive services in rural Nakasongola, Uganda, two hours north of the capital, by assessing the safety, quality and feasibility of DMPA provision by community reproductive health workers as compared with DMPA provided in clinics. The findings from this research reinforce the wealth of experience from other regions suggesting that well-trained CHWS can safely provide contraceptive injections.

  • Contraceptive Injections by Community Health Workers in Uganda | Community Resource

    This study compared the safety and quality of contraceptive injections given by community-based health workers with those given by clinic-based nurses in a rural Nakasongola District, Uganda. A nonrandomized community trial compared provision of injectable Depo Provera (DMPA) by community reproductive health workers with routine DPMA provision at health units. Ninety-five percent of CHW clients were "satisfied" or "highly satisfied" with services. There were no serious injection site problems in either group.

Syndicate content