PMTCT | USAID Health Care Improvement Portal
Follow Us HCI Project on FacebookHCI Project on Vimeo
Why Register?     Register      Login

PMTCT

  • Tanzania | Morogoro ART/PMTCT Improvement Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Tanzania | Mtwara ART/PMTCT Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Guatemala | ProCONE Community Demonstration Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Tanzania | Lindi ART/PMTCT Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Russia| Improvement of Social Support for HIV-infected mothers and their newly born children (St. Petersburg) | Collaborative Profile
  • Tanzania | Iringa Region Infant Feeding Improvement Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Rapport d’Activités de la Phase de Démonstration du Collaboratif d’Amélioration de la Qualité des Services et Soins VIH en Côte d’Ivoire | Publications

    Ce rapport décrit les résultats de la phase de démonstration d’une collaborative d'amélioration en Cote d'Ivoire mis en œuvre par le Projet de l’Amélioration des Soins de Santé de l’USAID (HCI),  le Programme National de Prise en Charge Médicale des Personnes Vivant avec le VIH (PNPEC), et le Ministère de la Santé et de l’Hygiène Publique pour améliorer la qualité des services VIH.

    Une évaluation initiale de la qualité de la prise en charge des Personne Vivant avec le VIH (PVVIH) réalisée en Juillet-Août 2008 dans 33 structures sanitaires réparties sur tout le territoire national, a montré d’importantes opportunités d’amélioration aux différentes composantes de la prise en charge. Après la restitution des résultats de l’évaluation initiale et la mise en places des organes du collaboratif, 41 sites (dont 34 sites de la Prévention de la Transmission Mère Enfant, ou PTME, et 38 sites de la prise en charge des antirétroviral, ou ARV) ont été sélectionnés pour la phase de démonstration du collaboratif.
  • Results from the Pilot Phase of an ART/PMTCT Improvement Collaborative in Cote d’Ivoire | Publications

    This technical report describes results achieved during the demonstration phase of an improvement collaborative implemented in Cote d’Ivoire by the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI), the National Program for the Medical Management of People Living with HIV/AIDS (PNPEC), and the Ministry of Health and Public Hygiene in order to improve the quality of HIV services.

    An initial evaluation of the quality of care and treatment for persons living with HIV (PLHIV) was conducted from July – August 2008 in 33 health care centers throughout Cote d’Ivoire in order to draw attention to the need for improvements among different components of care and treatment services. After the restitution of the results of the initial evaluation and the establishment of the elements of an improvement collaborative, 41 sites were selected to participate in the demonstration phase of the collaborative. Of these 41 sites, 34 provide prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services, and 38 provide anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment services.

  • Improving enrolment of HIV+ pregnant women in chronic HIV care/ART units at health facilities in Uganda | Publications

    HCI is working on improving the linkage of HIV+ pregnant women to chronic HIV/PMTCT services in 19 health facilities in the Eastern region of Uganda. Quality improvement teams at these sites will test changes aiming to improve these linkages. The effectiveness of these changes will be monitored by selected indicators. Changes that are found to be successful based on monitoring the indicators will then be shared across all 19 facilities. It is expected that by the end of the demonstration period there will be a list of effective changes that can then be spread to more facilities across Uganda.

    Research Questions
    This cross-sectional pre/post evaluation seeks to evaluate the scale of linkage problems, identify their causes, and inform health facility interventions to improve the linkages between ANC and chronic care for HIV+ mothers. The specific study questions are:
     
    1.      What proportion of HIV+ pregnant women registered in ANC units at health facilities are enrolled into chronic HIV care units?
    2.      What mechanisms do the health facilities use to ensure successful linkage of HIV+ pregnant women to HIV care clinic?
    3.      What factors do pregnant or recently (6 months) delivered women report that promoted their successful enrollment into chronic care from ANC units?

     

  • Cote d’Ivoire| HIV Care and Treatment-ART and PMTCT Spread Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Tanzania | Tanga Region ART/PMTCT Improvement Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Effets du collaboratif d’amélioration sur les indicateurs PTME et ARV en Côte d’Ivoire : Etude Comparative | Publications

    La Côte d’Ivoire a une prévalence élevée du VIH, avec 4,7 % de la population infectée par le virus. Cependant en 2008, une évaluation nationale de la prévention de la transmission mère-enfant du VIH (PTME) et les services de thérapie antirétrovirale (ARV) ont montré un écart important dans la qualité des soins tant dans le secteur privé que public. Pour mesurer les effets du collaboratif quant à la réduction des écarts, le Projet d’Amélioration des soins de santé de l’USAID (HCI) en Côte d’Ivoire, a comparé les résultats obtenus dans les sites de démonstration et ceux obtenus sur de nouveaux sites qui allaient rejoindre le projet. Ce rapport décrit le collaboratif d’amélioration qui a été mis en place par HCI en 2009 pour améliorer les soins et services ARV/PTME offerts aux PVVIH (Personne Vivant avec le VIH).

  • Améliorer la documentation et le maintien des patients dans le programme de prise en charge du VIH en Côte d’Ivoire | Publications

    En 2008, à la demande du Ministère de la santé, avec l’appui financier du PEPFAR, le Projet d’Amélioration des Soins de Santé de l’USAID (HCI) a été invité à assister le Programme National de Prise en Charge des personnes vivant avec le VIH (PNPEC) pour conduire une évaluation nationale de la qualité des soins dans le domaine du VIH en Côte d’Ivoire. HCI et les partenaires de mise en œuvre ont conduit une évaluation nationale de la qualité des soins et services offerts aux PVVIH. Sur la base de l’évaluation, un comité technique dirigé par le PNPEC avec l’appui technique d’URC a développé un paquet de changement pour améliorer la documentation, le suivi et la rétention des patients. Ce rapport décrit les résultats du collaboratif d’amélioration d’ARV/PTME.  

  • Amélioration de la Qualité des Soins et Services en Côte d'Ivoire | Publications

     

    Apres plus d’une décennie de soin et de traitement d’ARV, il semble très important pour le PNPEC de se concentrer sur la qualité des interventions. Pour répondre à ce besoin, le PNPEC à fait appel au support technique d’URC pour mettre en œuvre un processus d’amélioration de la qualité avec le soutien financier du PEPFAR. Les résultats de cet effort national à travers le Projet d’Amélioration des Soins de Santé de l'USAID (HCI) conduit par URC.  
     
    Ce rapport décrit les objectifs de quatre projets d’amélioration dirigés par HCI en Cote d’Ivoire :
    1.    ARV-PTME : Améliorer la qualité de la prise en charge des PVVIH par le traitement antirétroviral et celle des services de prévention de la transmission mère-enfant du VIH.
    2.    OEV : Améliorer la qualité des services offerts aux OEV et leurs familles à travers le développement des normes et bonnes pratiques.
    3.    Prévention : Développer la norme Nationale pour les programmes d’éducation par les pairs dans le domaine du VIH/sida.
    4.    Laboratoire : Renforcer les capacités techniques des laboratoires impliqués dans le programme d’accréditation selon le schéma OMS-AFRO.

     

  • Strengthening systems and improving health outcomes in Tanzania | Publications

     

    In 2007, USAID asked HCI to work in collaboration with the Dutch agency PharmAccess International (PAI) to assist the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW) of Tanzania, regional and district level stakeholders, and implementing partners to set up a harmonized QI program for ART and PMTCT services in line with the MoHSW’s National Quality Improvement Framework. This short report describes HCI's approach to develop and promote a harmonized QI plan for ART and PMTCT services countrywide using a uniform set of QI tools, indicators and a reporting process integrated into the existing MoHSW monitoring and evaluation channels.
  • Feasibility of Proposed Quality Criteria for Monitoring and Improving HIV Services | Publications

    At the request of the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator (OGAC), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (Global Fund), the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) developed an approach to yield meaningful information about the quality of HIV services for users at multiple levels of the health system. The approach proposes 16 quality criteria (QC) that were assessed through 25 existing indicators. The indicators were based on measures previously required or recommended by funders and other stakeholders, such as the Global Fund, PEPFAR, and the World Health Organization. This report presents the findings from a field test of the approach in five countries in three world regions: Africa, Eurasia, and Southeast Asia.

    As a result of its findings, the report offers three recommendations:
     
    1.) Increase facilities’ ability to use indicator data by requiring denominators that reflect the number of patients who visit a facility;
    2.) Encourage monthly monitoring and the use of data to make decisions to manage and improve care processes; and
    3.) Improve the use and reporting of quality criteria data by: (a) supporting countries in using up-to date, centralized record systems to record patient status, (b) establishing systems to track and ensure attendance, (c) linking different service areas, and (d) supporting countries in building capacity to use their data to make decisions and improve the quality of their services.
  • Quality Improvement of HIV and AIDS programs: experiences from South Africa (2007 - 2010) | Publications

    This presentation was given by Dr. Donna Jacobs, HCI Country Director for South Africa, at the 28th International Conference of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, Ltd. (ISQua), which took place in Hong Kong, China from September 14-17, 2011. The conference theme was, “Patient Safety: Sustaining the Global Momentum."

  • Feasibility of Using Quality Criteria to Monitor and Improve the Quality of HIV Services | Publications

    This short report describes assistance that the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) is providing to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) and to the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator (OGAC) to develop an approach that can be used to harmonize global reporting and improve the quality of HIV services and health outcomes. This study details HCI’s approach that employs 16 quality criteria for 5 HIV service delivery areas: testing and counseling, care and treatment, PMTCT, TB/HIV, and harm reduction. Field tests were conducted in five selected countries: 3 in Africa, 1 in Eurasia and 1 in Southeast Asia.  

  • Assessment of the Quality of HIV/AIDS Services in Malawi | Publications
    This report assesses the quality of selected HIV/AIDS services in 20 health facilities in Southern Malawi in April and May 2010. The assessment was conducted by Family Health International (FHI) in response to a task order issued under the USAID HCI Project and in coordination with Malawi's Ministry of Health. Data collection tools were adapted from HCI tools used in earlier assessments in Uganda and Cote d’Ivoire to gather information on antiretroviral therapy (ART), the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), the HIV/AIDS continuum of care, and laboratory services. Of the 20 facilities assessed, 80% were in the public sector, including the military services, and 20% were run by faith-based organizations. Eighty-five percent were in rural areas and 15% in urban areas.
  • Sequential Validity of Quality Improvement Team Self-assessments in Tanzania | Publications

     

    Emerging evidence indicates that collaborative improvement is a cost-effective way to improve health care quality in diverse cultures. Such improvement generally relies on data from quality improvement (QI) teams’ own assessment of their facility’s performance and results. The validity of self-assessment data is important to both the teams themselves and to the collaborative as a whole: These data provide QI teams with the information they need to identify quality problems and to learn whether their actions actually improved quality. 
    This report presents the results of an investigation of sequential validity of self-assessment by service providers in an improvement collaborative in the Mtwara Region of Tanzania. Study objectives were to determine the validity of self-assessments by the QI teams and whether validity improved during the first year of the collaborative.
    The study was carried out in nine health care facilities participating in an improvement collaborative in Mtwara Region of Tanzania, during its first 10 months of activity. The collaborative is addressing HIV/AIDS care, particularly as it relates to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT). 
    The research team defined eight activities in the self-assessment process that can influence the validity of the information that results: 1) writing the records, 2) storing and retrieving records, 3) selecting records from which to abstract data, 4) abstracting data from the selected records, 5) summarizing the abstractions, 6) the agreement of computer and written records, 7) the quality and use of computer records, and 8) communicating the summary data (results related to improving the quality of care) to other members of the QI team and the clinical staff. The team then developed and tested forms and procedures for measuring the validity of the information each activity produced.   
    The study found significant upward trends in measurement scores occurred for the tasks of writing the record, selecting the sample, the use of computer results, and communicating results. No significant change in validity occurred in storing and retrieving records, abstracting or summarizing selected records, or agreement of written records with computer records. However, some of these activities started high and remained high throughout the study: For retrieving records, validity was close to 100% in the first and last two measurements for most cases; for abstracting records, a small increase occurred in validity during the study for all three indicators but was significant for only one of them; and for summarizing abstracts, errors were zero or close to it throughout the study. Changes in validity were roughly the same for all three indicators.
    Over the course of the study, validity either improved or started and remained high for most self-assessment activities; none decreased. The communication activity, which differs from the others in that it does not contribute directly to the validity of the performance scores reported by the QI teams, had a very low end-of-study score across all sites, suggesting limited use of data for QI activities. With few exceptions, this study shows that self-assessment as part of Mtwara improvement collaborative provided valid data and improved as the collaborative matured. This finding—coupled with the result that some steps in the self-assessment process, such as storing and retrieving records and communicating results, are not always done well—suggests the need to address these activities early in a collaborative. The finding that the validity of abstracted data between QI teams and the gold standard set by the expert reviewers was not statistically different is especially encouraging.
Syndicate content