Institutionalizing Health Care Improvement | USAID Health Care Improvement Portal
Follow Us HCI Project on FacebookHCI Project on Vimeo
Why Register?     Register      Login

Institutionalizing Health Care Improvement

  • Guatemala | ProCONE Basic Spread | Collaborative Profile
  • Guatemala | ProCONE Complication Demonstration Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Guatemala | ProCONE Community Demonstration Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Nicaragua | Family Planning Expansion Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Nicaragua | Family Planning Demonstration Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Nicaragua | HIV Counseling and Testing Collaborative for People with STIs | Collaborative Profile
  • Honduras| Referral Systems Collaborative-Comayagua | Collaborative Profile
  • Nicaragua | Prevention and Management of Obstetric and Neonatal Complications (CONE) Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • Nicaragua | Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Improvement Collaborative | Collaborative Profile
  • QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES ON MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION IN 16 AIDSRelief PARTNER FACILITIES: SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES | Improvement Report
  • Institutionalization of Improved Quality of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in Demonstration and Replication Regions| Honduras | Publications

     

    This study investigates whether the improvements in quality of care achieved during implementation of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) activities in Honduras were maintained over time. CQI was implemented in Honduras in two phases using different strategies. The first, demonstration phase was implemented by the USAID/HCI project in five health regions from 2004 to 2006. A second replication phase in 2007 to 2009 expanded CQI to six additional regions, reproducing the approach used in the demonstration phase, but implemented by the Honduran Secretariat of Health through its Department of Quality Assurance (DGC). Given these two different implementation strategies for introducing CQI in Honduras, this research study sought to:
    1. 1.  Analyze differences in the process and results between the demonstration and replication phases for the purpose of learning strengths and weaknesses of each phase to guide spread activities.
    2. 2.    Document the level of QI institutionalization and/or activities maintained upon finalization of the implementation phase to determine what needs to be strengthened.
    3. 3.     Document the changes implemented that have been successful in achieving improvements in EONC care for the purpose of spreading these effective changes to other regions.
    Methodology: Two research studies were conducted: 1) a retrospective study to compare QI implementation during the demonstration and replication phases and 2) a cross-sectional analysis to evidence the level of institutionalization achieved after the implementation phases ended. From the 224 health units that participated in the EONC QI project (119 from the demonstration phase and 105 from the replication phase), we selected a representative sample of 31 health units, 17 from the demonstration phase and 14 from the replication phase within the 11 health regions targeted.
     
    Results: The study examined several elements of institutionalization of QI, including measures of developmental/preparatory activities that impact CQI implementation (such as training and coaching, sharing experiences, and rewards and incentives), the establishment of a supportive environment for institutionalization (including leadership, team work, values that support CQI, support from higher authorities, and continuous coaching/supervision), and evidence of institutionalization (such as use of clinical and CQI norms and standards, consistent performance of CQI activities), and impact on outcome indicators. Overall, results were similar in the demonstration and replication phases, although differences did emerge in areas such as coaching/supervision, mean number of trainings attended, and QI team opportunities for sharing experiences and lessons learned with one another. Overall, compliance with indicators of obstetric care (prenatal, delivery, postpartum and obstetric complications) increased from 80% to 90% in demonstration sites while in replication increased from values around 50% to almost reach 80%.
     
    The study provides recommendations on training, coaching, motivation/incentives, reporting, coordination/supervision, and community support to guide institutionalization of QI and improved quality of care and to strengthen current implementation in both demonstration and replication regions.   

     

  • Sostenibilidad de las Acciones y Capacidades para Impulsar el Mejoramiento Continuo de la Calidad en la Atención Materna-Infantil en AMOCSA Chinandega | Publications

     

    La dinámica del mejoramiento continuo de la calidad en la atención materno-infantil en Nicaragua, facilitada desde 2000 por los proyectos de USAID—Garantía de Calidad (QAP) y posteriormente, de Mejoramiento de la Atención en Salud (HCI)—abarcó las unidades de salud del Ministerio de Salud en 16 de los 17 Sistemas Locales de Atención Integral en Salud (SILAIS) en el país. En el período, la cooperación técnica en materia de mejoramiento de la atención en salud también se dirigió a Instituciones Prestadoras de Servicios de Salud (IPSS) coordinadas por el Instituto Nicaragüense de Seguridad Social (INSS) y normadas por el MINSA. La Asociación Médica de Occidente, S.A. (AMOCSA) pertenece a las IPSS incluidas en este grupo y se destacó como la que mejor aprovechó la cooperación de USAID.
    Al concluir la cooperación en AMOCSA (2004 – 2009), USAID decidió la realización del estudio sobre la sostenibilidad de las acciones y capacidades para impulsar el mejoramiento continuo de la calidad (MCC) en la atención materno-infantil en AMOCSA Chinandega, a fin de precisar el desarrollo alcanzado por esta IPSS, como resultado de la asistencia técnica brindada, así como, para mostrar que el MCC y las intervenciones de mejora son sostenibles, aún sin la asistencia técnica externa.
    El objetivo general del presente estudio es determinar los avances alcanzados por AMOCSA Chinandega, usando datos a nivel de la unidad de salud, según la muestra seleccionada, en cuanto a la sostenibilidad de las acciones y capacidades para impulsar el mejoramiento continuo de la calidad (MCC), así como de las mejoras de la calidad de la atención en el área materno-infantil, posterior a la asistencia técnica brindada por USAID (QAP y HCI). 
    Este estudio, descriptivo-evaluativo, presenta la situación actual de AMOCSA Chinandega, en relación con la sostenibilidad del MCC y de las mejoras de la calidad de atención, a fin de evaluar su nivel de avance en este sentido. Las técnicas aplicadas fueron: consulta documental, encuesta auto-administrada y aplicación de la herramienta elaborada por HCI para medir la Documentación, Análisis, Diseminación e Institucionalización (DASI por sus siglas en inglés) de mejoras en la atención en salud a nivel de la empresa.
    Este estudio constituye la primera experiencia para indagar sobre la implementación del MCC en las instituciones privadas de prestación de servicios de salud en Nicaragua. Los resultados muestran que AMOCSA tiene una plataforma firme para fortalecer el MCC y sostener los niveles de calidad, así mismo, que la intervención de los proyectos de USAID ha impactado en toda la organización.
    El estudio ha constado que el MCC se ha establecido como un proceso de trabajo permanente en AMOCSA que se ha extendido a todas las 10 áreas de funcionamiento de AMOCSA (Consulta Externa, Enfermería, Farmacia, Laboratorio, Recepción, Riesgos, Atención al Cliente, Auditoría de Procesos, Mantenimiento e Higiene y Seguridad) y a sus tres Filiales: Corinto, El Viejo y Chichigalpa.
    El estudio también señaló una serie de áreas donde AMOCSA puede alcanzar mayor madurez en la implementación del MCC.  Entre estas áreas se destacan: el bajo uso de la información para la toma de decisiones, el proceso de supervisión, la instancia creada para la auditoría de procesos y la necesidad de actualizar el Programa de Gestión de la Calidad mediante una metodología participativa. Las variables e indicadores utilizados en este estudio pueden ser incorporados por AMOCSA en el monitoreo de las actividades de MCC para continuar su avance en el mejoramiento continuo de la atención en salud.
     
    (El resumen ejecutivo del informe final del estudio está disponible también en inglés.)
  • Sostenibilidad de las Mejoras en la Atención Materno-Infantil e Institucionalización del Mejoramiento Continuo de la Calidad en Nicaragua | Publications

     

    Desde el año 2000, la cooperación técnica entre el Ministerio de Salud de Nicaragua (MINSA) y la Agencia de los Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional (USAID) se ha concentrado en la mejora de la atención clínica en las unidades de salud y los hospitales que prestan atención materno-infantil. Este estudio mide la sostenibilidad de las mejoras en la atención materno-infantil y la institucionalización del mejoramiento continuo de la calidad (MCC) realizado entre los años 2000 y 2010 en la asociación entre MINSA y el Quality Assurance Project (QAP) y su sucesor, el Proyecto de USAID de Mejoramiento de la Atención en Salud (USAID Health Care Improvement Project, HCI). Los resultados de este estudio ayudarán a MINSA a dar prioridad a su continuo apoyo a MCC en unidades de salud específicas en Nicaragua.
    Este estudio se trata de las mejoras de la calidad en los procesos de atención implementadas mediante el MCC y si se han incorporado en la estructura administrativa en cada unidad. Se centra en determinar cómo este sistema de apoyo puesto en práctica durante la intervención ha ayudado en el mantenimiento de MCC en el funcionamiento y la organización de la unidad. Tal institucionalización es necesaria para la sostenibilidad de mejoras en los servicios clínicos.
    Este estudio, el primero en su tipo en Nicaragua, examina los diferentes componentes que comprenden la institucionalización con el fin de medir el nivel de institucionalización alcanzado por las unidades de salud en Nicaragua.  El estudio utilizó métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos para recopilar datos sobre la capacitación clínica y en el MCC, creación de liderazgo, reconocimiento y estímulos del MCC, estandarización de los procesos de atención, consenso sobre los valores para el MCC, y las actividades del MCC y la institucionalización de los procesos de atención. Para la recopilación de información se aplicaron ocho tipos de instrumentos incluyendo cuestionarios auto-administrados, entrevistas y grupos focales.
    Dieciséis SILAIS de los 17 del país participaron en las intervenciones del MCC. Diez SILAIS fueron seleccionados en base a ciertas características y prioridades del MINSA. Dos centros de salud por cada SILAIS fueron seleccionados para una muestra de 20 de los 154 de centros de salud en el país. Todos de los 10 hospitales en los SILAIS seleccionados que ofrecen atención materno-infantil (uno hospital por cada SILAIS) también se incluyeron en la muestra. Diez SILAIS (62% de los participantes en el MCC), 20 centros de salud (2 por cada SILAIS, 13% del total de 154 del país) y 10 hospitales (1 por cada SILAIS, 100% de los que brindan atención materno-infantil de 10 SILAIS).
    Las 30 unidades de salud de 10 SILAIS de la muestra del estudio tienen factores que han puesto cada uno en vías distintas hacia la sostenibilidad de las mejores prácticas y la institucionalización del MCC con el objetivo de mejorar los resultados sanitarios. Cada vía ha sido influenciada por factores externos e internos y el estado del sistema nacional de salud en general.
    El énfasis que ha tenido la intervención de QAP/USAID - USAID/HCI se ve reflejado en el mayor avance logrado en dos aspectos: la sostenibilidad de las mejoras clínicas y la institucionalización del desarrollo de competencias clínicas y en el MCC.
    El estudio refleja, sobre todo, la necesidad de fortalecer las competencias para implementar el MCC con mayor dominio, sistematicidad y por ende, influya con mayor fuerza en la sostenibilidad de las mejoras en la unidad de salud. Si bien es cierto que una limitación importante es la escasez de recursos en el sistema de salud, también hay oportunidades de mejora que se pueden lograr aprovechando más el MCC.

     

    (El resumen ejecutivo del informe final está disponible también en inglés.)
  • Insights from a National Health Care Quality Improvement Strategy Meeting | Kampala, Uganda, March 21-22, 2011 | Publications

    The Uganda Ministry of Health (MoH) Quality Improvement Strategy Meeting was convened in Kampala, Uganda, on March 21–22, 2011. The meeting provided a forum for various departments within the MoH, selected partners, and international improvement experts to share experiences, clarify the role of Government partners, and discuss lessons learned from implementing health care quality improvement initiatives at national and local levels. The MoH Quality Assurance Department (QAD) together with the United States Agency for International Development Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) organized and supported this meeting. 

    Dr. Henry Mwebesa, Commissioner of QAD, chaired the meeting. Dr. M. Rashad Massoud, Director of HCI and Senior Vice President of the Quality & Performance Institute, University Research Co., LLC, designed and facilitated for the meeting.

    Throughout the two days, participants shared their experiences with quality improvement (QI) efforts across multiple levels of the health sector, identified challenges and interventions while implementing QI, and made recommendations for harmonizing and sustaining QI efforts in Uganda. Examples discussed were from Uganda, Afghanistan, Sweden, Niger, South Africa, Ethiopia, Russia, and Palestine. 

    This report summarizes the key discussions during the meeting.

  • Results of a Study on Sustainability of Improvements in Maternal Child Care and Institutionalization of Continuous Quality Improvement in 30 Ministry of Health facilities in 10 SILAIS in Nicaragua | Publications

    This study, which measures the level of sustainability of improvements in maternal child care and the Institutionalization of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), is being undertaken at the end of a 10 year period (2000 – 2010) of technical assistance on CQI for maternal child care (MCH) to Ministry of Health (MINSA) facilities in Nicaragua. USAID – Nicaragua, in coordination with MINSA, will use the results of the study to prioritize their continued support for CQI within specific health facilities in Nicaragua.

    This study focuses on answering, above all, whether quality improvements in care processes implemented through CQI have been incorporated into and are used on a daily basis by health care workers in health units in Nicaragua. The study also focuses on determining how the support system put in place through establishing the institutionalization of CQI assists facilities in maintaining CQI within the unit’s operation and organization. Such support is reflected in the existence of basic managerial, organizational, and other conditions necessary for sustainability and institutionalization.
     
    This study is the first one of its kind for USAID in Nicaragua. While other USAID-supported studies in Nicaragua have focused on specific aspects of institutionalization, this study is a full analysis of sustainability of quality care improvements and CQI through an examination of the many diverse components that comprise these two concepts.
     
    Methodology:
    This study includes both quantitative and qualitative data, with variables related to clinical and CQI training, leadership creation, acknowledgment and recognition of CQI, standardization of the care process, consensus on values for CQI, and CQI activities and institutionalization of the care processes. Measurable indicators were created for each of these variables. Data were collected from facilities in 10 out of the 17 SILIAS in Nicaragua using eight different types of instruments, including self-administered questionnaires, individual interviews and/or focus groups.
     
    Results:
    Among the study’s findings were that the trainings used to orient staff to CQI were similar in the 10 SILIAS, although there were some differences in whether trainings were offered as workshops or in the form of continuous education. Overall, 367 trainings were held between 2005 and 2010 and the average number of participants per course was 7.85. Ninety-four percent of the health centers and hospitals (28 of 30) reported that there was a CQI leader at that facility. However, 57% of the health professionals who participated in the focus group discussions were “in disagreement” that they had received respect, recognition or rewards for efforts and activities in CQI. The study found that in general health professionals had the opinion that key values related to CQI were important, including genuine interest in quality improvement, interest in improving user satisfaction, team work, and respect for ideas or input from staff. 
     
    The study found high compliance with selected vital clinical standards, with seven of the ten SILIAS performing at levels above 80%, and 20 of the 30 health facilities studied were carrying out more than 80% of 13 key CQI activities with the correct frequency.
     
    The ten year period of USAID-supported technical assistance though the QAP, HCI, and other projects focused on maternal and child health has coincided with a reduction in maternal mortality from 98 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2000 to 69 deaths per 100,000 in 2010. Similarly, infant mortality decreased from 50 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2000 to 29 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2010, and child mortality from 72 deaths per 1,000 live births to 35 deaths per 1,000 live births.
     
    Conclusions:

    Based on the results of this sustainability/institutionalization study, one can see that the 30 health units from 10 SILAIS included in the sample in this study have qualities and factors that have put each of these health facilities in different pathways all with the same end goal of sustainability of best practices and institutionalization of CQI leading to improved health outcomes. The largest impact that the QAP/USAID - USAID/HCI intervention has had can be seen in the progress achieved in two aspects: the sustainability of clinical best practices and the institutionalization of the development of clinical skills and abilities and CQI. The variability seen in the different health units can help identify certain challenges and optimizing conditions, already in place or in the process of being developed, that can be used and replicated to achieve sustainability and institutionalization of CQI at the national level.

     

  • Process and Level of Institutionalization Achieved in AMOCSA, a Private Health Care Entity in Chinandega, Nicaragua | Publications

    USAID has supported the introduction and implementation of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) activities in Nicaragua since the year 2000, first through the Quality Improvement Project (QAP) and most recently through the Health Care Improvement (HCI) Project. These quality improvement activities focused primarily on Ministry of Health (MINSA) facilities. However, private health care facilities were invited to participate. The Medical Association of the West (La Asociacion Medica de Occidente, S.A.) (AMOCSA) was one of these private health care facilities and has participated in CQI activities since 2004. AMOCSA, through this collaboration with QAP/HCI/USAID, participated in a series of improvement activities in order to improve the quality of services offered to clients with a specific focus on maternal and infant health, family planning, and prevention of infections. Assistance was provided for: standardization of the care process, monitoring the compliance with care standards using relevant indicators, guaranteeing the right to proper care for newborns including breast feeding, strengthening the team approach, and measuring the satisfaction of patients in the facilities. In 2007, through technical assistance from HCI/USAID, a Quality Management Program was developed for AMOCSA in order to ensure sustainability of continued quality improvement activities into the future.

    While there have been a number of studies examining the process and impact of institutionalization in Ministry of Health facilities in Nicaragua, there have been few studies examining the process and impact of institutionalization in private facilities. This study examines the process and impact of institutionalization in AMOCSA facilities: the development process related to clinical and QI training, the enabling environment for QI, and the evidence for institutionalization and sustainability of CQI.
     
    Research questions/objectives: 
    In order to examine the process and level of institutionalization of CQI in AMOCSA, this research study seeks to: 
    1.      Identify how CQI activities are organized and implemented in AMOCSA facilities and the leadership that is received from higher authorities with respect to the development process for CQI, including initial training of personnel in key quality improvement activities, additional training (continuing education, workshops, and on the job technical assistance), and training for new personnel. 
    2.      Examine which aspects of the supporting environment for CQI contribute to the CQI institutionalization process including leadership, values for CQI, rewards and incentives, CQI team stability, and support from higher authorities.
    3.      Analyze the evidence for institutionalization within AMOCSA including how CQI activities have become part of the daily routine, how clinical procedures and norms have become standardized, examples of QI activities that have been incorporated into clinical standards, as well as quantitative results showing the appropriate practice of CQI activities, knowledge and ability with respect to CQI activities, compliance with clinical norms and standards.
    4.      Compare AMOCSA facilities and MINSA facilities in Chinandega with respect to several CQI institutionalization indicators.
     
    Methodology: 

    This study is a qualitative cross sectional study where a sample of heath care professionals working in AMOCSA facilities in Chinandega are surveyed on their exposure to different aspects of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Most of the survey questions refer to CQI activities that are currently being implemented in AMOCSA, while some survey questions refer to activities that may have happened over a longer period of time. Responses from the study participants are used to measure the level of institutionalization achieved in AMOCSA facilities. A convenience sample of 27 study participants was selected. Each of the participants answered a self-administered questionnaire that included questions on the development process for CQI, the enabling environment for CQI, evidence of institutionalization of CQI and other external factors.

     

  • Reducing the waiting time for HIV/AIDS patients attending Mengo Hospital HIV clinic, an urban hospital in Uganda | Improvement Report
  • Sustaining Better Maternal and Newborn Care and Quality Improvement in Niger: Challenges and Successes | Publications

    Collaborative improvement is a QI strategy to improve the quality of care and facilitate the emergence of a culture of quality in a network of participating sites, by bringing together the energy and creativity of different sites to address key quality issues in an efficient and effective manner. Little research has been done to document the extent of institutionalization achieved at the end of formal collaborative improvement activities. This evaluation examines the extent of institutionalization of quality improvement after the end of technical assistance to an essential obstetric and newborn care (EONC) improvement collaborative in Niger. This quality improvement initiative was launched by USAID’s Quality Assurance Project in 2006 and aimed to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care services according to evidence-based standards. When external technical support for the learning sessions and coaching visits ended in December 2008, this afforded an opportunity to study whether the gains achieved during the program could be sustained.

    This longitudinal study used a modified pre/post design to measure sustained gains and continued implementation of QI activities through the collaborative and post-collaborative period. A first post-collaborative assessment was done in June 2009; the findings from this assessment were used to develop the “institutionalization change package”, which was introduced to the sites in October 2009. A second assessment was done in August 2010 to measure the impact of the institutionalization change package. Both assessments focused on a sample of 20 out of the total 52 sites participating in the EONC collaborative. Data collection methods included site level interviews with key informants and QI team members, observation of care, simulations, and clinical chart reviews. Interviews and discussions were also held with officials at district, regional, and central levels in the Ministry of Health.

    The experiences of Niger and other countries in quality improvement over the years indicate that QI cannot simply “taught” in a generic workshop setting, nor can it flourish without technical support and the integration of QI initiatives into the micro and macro aspects of the health system. Sustaining gains in quality of care and institutionalizing QI into the fabric of health care requires simultaneous efforts at both the strategic policy level and in the priority activities of the system.
    The experience of Niger offers some key lessons and some key insights into the institutionalization process. The 20 sites included in the study had benefitted significantly from the EONC improvement collaborative activities, which provided both clinical and QI skills, coaching support, and opportunities to share results and effective changes. These benefits are reflected in the consistently high levels of compliance with EONC standards (verified through external chart review and direct observation of care) at these 20 sites.
    While this study did not have the power to test hypotheses, the study has shed some light on certain assumptions about collaborative improvement and its contribution to institutionalization. While the collaborative itself is not a permanent activity or structure to be institutionalized, participation in collaborative activities can facilitate institutionalization of gains and sustainability of results.

  • How do quality improvement teams function after an improvement intervention ends? A description of team performance after the end of an obstetric and newborn QI initiative in Niger | Publications

    This is an evaluation of teamwork in the context of the Essential Obstetric and Newborn Care (EONC) Quality Improvement Collaborative in Niger. It focuses on what quality improvement performance looks like after the end of technical assistance for the quality improvement initiative. The quality improvement collaborative had been launched by USAID’s Quality Assurance Project in 2006 and aimed to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care services according to evidence-based standards. The external technical support for the learning sessions and coaching visits ended in December 2008, and this afforded an opportunity to study whether the gains achieved during the program could be sustained. This evaluation aims to understand the team dynamics (team stability and collaboration) that influence sustainability of quality improvement initiatives.   

    Methodology
    This is a descriptive sub-study which uses data from a larger study which aims to assess the degree of institutionalization of Quality Improvement. The institutionalization study’s baseline data collection, focused on a sample of 20 out of the current 51 sites participating in the EONC collaborative. A total of 20 key informants and 90 team members were interviewed at these sites. Data was also collected from clinic records on several quality of care indicators.
     
    Results
    The results of the study indicate that all teams were able to maintain adherence to norms and the improvement in outcomes achieved during the collaborative even six months after the collaborative ended. Also, 45% of the sampled sites (9 of 20) had applied their QI skills to domains that were not part of the collaborative. These new domains included prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) by 5 teams and malaria treatment by 3 teams.
     
    These results have been achieved in spite of the finding that there was a decrease in some of the QI team activities. We do expect the intensity of QI activities to taper off slightly once high quality of care has been achieved in a given area. Use of the process chart, regular internal coaching, graphing and annotating data, sharing within facilities and across facilities have all reduced. But it is important to note that those activities that help ensure that staff mobility does not affect care provided (ensuring new staff have the skills in clinical tasks, that they are oriented to how care is provided, and that standards are posted) and monitoring of performance indicators continued to be carried out in almost all sites, and at a similar intensity as was done during the collaborative. These activities could well explain the capacity to maintain results over time.
     
    There was no significant association between the number of team meetings held and activities performed after the collaborative. There was also no significant association between the number of QI activities implemented and either team collaboration scores or team stability. But perceived QI competency is strongly correlated with QI team stability – those teams that have had many of their original members leave have lower perceived competence, and teams that had retained more of their original members were more likely to have expanded their application of QI. Overall, only 60% of original team members remained with the teams. National hospitals fared the worst in retaining trained personnel with only 35% of the original team remaining.
     
    The skills and experience that quality improvement teams gained from the collaborative improvement approach enabled them to continue achieving results even six months after the end of the collaborative. All teams maintained the gains in care and some even applied quality improvement to other areas. This finding reflects that quality improvement is a cross cutting skill that can be applied across all health domains and contributes to health systems strengthening. QI skills diminished in the months after the collaborative and this may indicate that the capacity for improvement could be lost over time. Although sites appear strong in ensuring what is needed to continue implementation of the clinical standards, they are doing less related to QI activities. Their declining capacity to carry out QI tasks may affect their ability to address issues if the quality of care drops and if they needed to expand their improvement efforts to other areas. Integrating quality improvement into national policy may help offset this reduction in external support which may be important in ensuring high levels of QI team performance. 
     
    For more information about this study, please consult the complete study report and the following tools:
     

     

  • Pérenniser la Qualité des Soins de Santé: L’Institutionnalisation de l’Assurance de Qualité | Publications

    La monographie présente un cadre conceptuel pour aider les systèmes et les organisations de soins à analyser, planifier, construire et pérenniser les efforts visant à produire des soins de qualité. Le cadre fait la synthèse des plus de dix années d’expérience du Projet d’Assurance de Qualité (AQ) dans l’assistance à la conception et à la mise en oeuvre d’activités et de programmes d’AQ dans plus de vingt-cinq pays. Au coeur de tout effort d’institutionnalisation de la prestation de soins de santé de qualité, il y a trois activités fonda-mentales d’AQ : définir la qualité, mesurer la qualité et améliorer la qualité. Ces activités fondamentales sont élaborées, portées à plus grande échelle, et elles sont pleinement intégrées au fonctionnement d’une organisation par l’institutionnalisation. La présente monographie a été rédigée pour fournir une information pratique aux ministères de la santé et autres organisations sanitaires dans leur quête pour des soins de qualité qui soient durables. Elle décrit les éléments nécessaires pour inculquer une culture de la qualité et elle fournit en même temps une information pratique sur la manière de faciliter le processus nécessaire pour atteindre ce but. Un cadre de huit éléments essentiels et un processus par étapes pour l’institutionnali-sation de l’AQ présentent dans leurs grandes lignes les aspects cruciaux et la « feuille de route » à suivre pour créer un programme durable qui améliorera la qualité des soins de santé.

Syndicate content